![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Using the newest simulation technology, this flight data is input in our simulation software to demonstrate. We use actual system software overlaid with, and verified against, real time static and flight test data from all major global tanker platforms. I imagine that if the rotor blades did make contact with the fuel hose, either the fuel would be released and be sparked and ignite, or ingested by the helicopter turbines, or the rotor would break, or all of the above! When a helicopter is refueling, its rotor is nearly above the fuel hose, or at the maximum, maybe 20 feet away? It's easy to imagine a bit of turbulence or a few centimeters of cyclic movement (a sneeze perhaps?) is all that it would take for the rotor to dip and come forward and contact the hose.įor the Osprey the propellers / rotors are behind the nose of the aircraft and thus farther away from the fuel hose, but still, like a helicopter the Osprey's rotors are very large, and are exposed as opposed to the concealed compressor blades of a jet turbine. Coordinate with the aircraft being refueled your plan of action. Eaton is a leader in high fidelity development and modeling of air to air refueling systems. The math comes to then 20 minutes of aerial refuelling. The boom of a KC-135 (faster than a basket) can do around 3 tonnes a minute. For a B777, youre looking in the range of 60 tonnes of fuel for half a tank. How do military helicopters like the Blackhawk and CH-53, as well as the V-22 Osprey, perform mid-air refueling without their rotor blades (periodically and accidentally) contacting the drogue or fuel hose and causing a major accident? Fuel Quantity Unlike smaller fighter jets, you would need to offload a substantial quantity of fuel. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |